|
Post by seangladium on Jun 27, 2017 17:06:59 GMT
I found several interesting articles that discuss how many lower-skilled unemployed younger men are mostly filling their time playing video games instead of trying to begin careers/families (h/t @roratecaeli). (See www.weeklystandard.com/video-games-arent-good-for-you/article/2008641 and reason.com/archives/2017/06/13/young-men-are-playing-video-ga ) The articles suggested that instead of agitating for social revolution and the riots sure to follow that this could be a preferable solution--basically a somewhat newer opiate of the masses. This could at least partially explain why there is no real change in the current decline in the labor participation rate as well as why many people are no longer getting married and starting families. Or is it that many young men have despaired of finding meaningful employment and the confidence to start a new venture in life? And how will this effect the larger part of society or the state if this continues?
|
|
|
Post by servantofthechief on Jun 27, 2017 18:39:58 GMT
Speaking as a young man unemployed for a long time and someone who grew up in the 'videogame' generation of this island, I think I better postulate that there is actually a lot more going on here than just the degenerative effects of videogames on culture and society and why it affects young men disproportionately.
Going beyond the obvious appeals of games to the male of the species (which is a well known fact as old as the medium itself) the simple fact of the matter is this: Young men have absolutely no hope of starting a career, they have no hope of owning a home of their own and, I am going to need a female perspective to confirm this for me but, I sincerely suspect much like whats happening with the MGTOW movement in America (as much as I dislike it) getting up off the couch, finding a young woman to marry and start a family is simply increasingly not worth it. These men have no hope of a good career, are crushed under debt, both personal and national, and with the destruction of the family and the liberalisation and sexualization of the culture, why bother going through the risk of getting married if, as is the trend elsewhere in the west, they are increasingly likely to be divorced and lose most of whats theirs, including children? Videogames, even if we accept all the ill effects they are purported to cause as true are a symptom, not a cause.
Had we existed in a world without them, these young men would all be on drugs instead. Or would already be on the streets causing a revolution as angry young men without hope are wont to do. They have run the gamet of life from cradle to University and have less to show for it than their fathers did who dragged bags of coal for a living. Heckling them to get up off their arses and fight won't do any good and will only cause them to sink further into their couches in spite. You need to give them something to fight for, and that, I feel, is the real problem. We have nothing to offer them.
|
|
|
Post by Maolsheachlann on Jun 27, 2017 20:54:53 GMT
My experience of video games is limited. I'm now 39 (40 on October 22nd). In 2000-2001, when I was in my early twenties, I played two different computer games for sixteen hours in a row. The first was World Civilization by Sid Meier (version three). The second was called Shogun: Total War. I remember the second marathon well, because it was a snowy evening, and it was mere weeks before my mother died. After the second marathon, I decided: "No more computer games for me." I wasted the rest of my twenties in the cinema instead.
I tend to agree with servant, video games are more a symptom than a cause. I've only heard about the MGTOW movement and the manosphere second-hand, but I regard it as a tragedy that young men are now mirroring the bitterness and anger of feminism. We need harmony and mutual respect between the sexes, not cycles of resentment. However, I do think that video games may to some extent be a refuge from a society that increasingly stigmatizes men, and from the other harsh realities he describes.
On the other hand, there is the phenomenon of Gamergate, which (and I've only heard about this second-hand as well) was a vehement reaction against political correctness, white-bashing and man-bashing in the world of video-gaming. This seems to have spawned Milo Yiannapoulous and a lot of the free speech movement that is so vibrant today, at least on the internet. In a way, it indirectly inspired this forum. So there is that on the other side of the ledger.
I also, from a purely aesthetic point of view, I think that video games may have a legitimate value as works of art. As I say, I don't play them myself, but what I hear about some of them is quite interesting. I think they are here to stay one way or another.
|
|
|
Post by rogerbuck on Jun 29, 2017 10:23:37 GMT
Quickly - glad to see this thread and can't say much, as I know virtually nothing at all about video games! So I definitely need to be educated and was grateful for your link seangladium. Your comments servantofthechief were also very helpful to me - I am woefully out of touch with your generation. So hard to keep up with everything! I also, from a purely aesthetic point of view, I think that video games may have a legitimate value as works of art. As I say, I don't play them myself, but what I hear about some of them is quite interesting. I think they are here to stay one way or another. This is intriguing. Yes, these things aren't going away - so the question should become, I think, can they be lifted up into a more artistic and aesthetic experience? Or might there even be a possibility of Catholic and Christian games coming into existence one day . . .?
|
|
|
Post by MourningIreland on Jun 29, 2017 11:07:28 GMT
Speaking as a young man unemployed for a long time and someone who grew up in the 'videogame' generation of this island, I think I better postulate that there is actually a lot more going on here than just the degenerative effects of videogames on culture and society and why it affects young men disproportionately. Going beyond the obvious appeals of games to the male of the species (which is a well known fact as old as the medium itself) the simple fact of the matter is this: Young men have absolutely no hope of starting a career, they have no hope of owning a home of their own and, I am going to need a female perspective to confirm this for me but, I sincerely suspect much like whats happening with the MGTOW movement in America (as much as I dislike it) getting up off the couch, finding a young woman to marry and start a family is simply increasingly not worth it. These men have no hope of a good career, are crushed under debt, both personal and national, and with the destruction of the family and the liberalisation and sexualization of the culture, why bother going through the risk of getting married if, as is the trend elsewhere in the west, they are increasingly likely to be divorced and lose most of whats theirs, including children? Videogames, even if we accept all the ill effects they are purported to cause as true are a symptom, not a cause. Had we existed in a world without them, these young men would all be on drugs instead. Or would already be on the streets causing a revolution as angry young men without hope are wont to do. They have run the gamet of life from cradle to University and have less to show for it than their fathers did who dragged bags of coal for a living. Heckling them to get up off their arses and fight won't do any good and will only cause them to sink further into their couches in spite. You need to give them something to fight for, and that, I feel, is the real problem. We have nothing to offer them. Excellent analysis. I agree 100% that video games are a symptom not a cause and that the problems, as you cite, are twofold: the systemic problems in the economy and the breakdown of the culture of the family (which includes a court system that is extremely anti-male). I believe these two problems are closely related and were socially engineered, but that's another subject. The only thing I would question is the total lack of economic opportunity today, at least in Ireland. I have lived and worked in both Ireland and the US for long periods of time, and job opportunities here are much much better for young men than they are in America, at least in certain industries. Ireland has benefited hugely from the positive effects of globalisation. So while rural Ireland has many employment black spots, there are numerous job openings in Dublin, as well as retraining programmes for the unemployed that have strong vocational components and links with industry. A job will not fall into your lap, but in Ireland a good job is achievable with a combination of graft and good luck. NB: The fate of the unemployed under globalisation is a topic very close to my heart, having witnessed first hand its devastation on the American worker. Moreover I speak as someone who myself relocated and has started over more than once in my own working life, in both cases out of necessity not choice.
|
|
|
Post by servantofthechief on Jun 29, 2017 19:36:21 GMT
Excellent analysis. I agree 100% that video games are a symptom not a cause and that the problems, as you cite, are twofold: the systemic problems in the economy and the breakdown of the culture of the family (which includes a court system that is extremely anti-male). I believe these two problems are closely related and were socially engineered, but that's another subject. The only thing I would question is the total lack of economic opportunity today, at least in Ireland. I have lived and worked in both Ireland and the US for long periods of time, and job opportunities here are much much better for young men than they are in America, at least in certain industries. Ireland has benefited hugely from the positive effects of globalisation. So while rural Ireland has many employment black spots, there are numerous job openings in Dublin, as well as retraining programmes for the unemployed that have strong vocational components and links with industry. A job will not fall into your lap, but in Ireland a good job is achievable with a combination of graft and good luck. NB: The fate of the unemployed under globalisation is a topic very close to my heart, having witnessed first hand its devastation on the American worker. Moreover I speak as someone who myself relocated and has started over more than once in my own working life, in both cases out of necessity not choice. The problem here is exactly what you describe: All the opportunities are in Dublin, and virtually nowhere else on the island, except occasional jobs in the other cities in Ireland, Northern Ireland has the same problem but all the centralisation is focused on Belfast. Globalisation has effectively made these two cities the only cities that matter economically on the island. This wouldn't be a problem... If most people could actually afford to move to these cities in the first place for work. They simply can't the majority of the time unless they are already living in Dublin or near it (which I will grant, is about half the population of the island at present), to take an example from my own life, my last job was in Belfast, paying a wage of 9-10 pounds sterling per hour. I had to travel between one to one and a half hours to and again from work and home where I lived, simply because getting somewhere in Belfast that was affordable for someone making my wages was just nearly impossible, as was getting anywhere cheap enough from any of the towns and cities on the way to Belfast that were affordable, so I was forced to become a 'super commuter' as to what they are called now, so anything between 2-4 hours of my job was simply travelling to make ends meet. It was an entry level job too, so unless you won the Post Code Lottery, you were essentially screwed if you wanted a job that can give you an actual career path. Dublin, I would imagine, is far worse for this kind of effect for anyone who was not living within easy travel distance of Cork, Galway or Wexford, which are also job hubs but nothing on par with Dublin. Its even worse in England with the Behemoth that is London sitting on the Thames like a vampire sucking the life out of England. And as bad as all this is, its only bad news for those who sucked it up and got a degree, its worse in some ways (though better in others) for actual tradesmen, but it depends on how much of a demand there is for those trades at any given time. I am seriously considering reskilling as a welder so I actually have a trade to work with thirty years from now, because I am seriously seeing nothing on the horizon that's workable for people like me, but even that is merely a stopgap measure to keep my head above water. I know its not as bleak and devastating as it was for Middle America, because Ireland was always an agrarian country (although Dublin and especially Northern Ireland was more industrial focused, the North especially and most of those jobs were dominated by the Protestants for obvious reasons) but that just means we had less of a height to fall from when the Celtic Tiger crashed and the enervating effects of globalisation kicked in. I could also go into detail about how all of this is only going to get so much worse when Automation finally kills off 60-90% of the white collar work of the professionals before cutting their way down and making a lot of labour workers obsolete, but thats another topic and its still 5-10 years away before it gets really bad and noticeable, so I won't go into detail here. Suffice it to say, the majority of people with my skills and degree will simply not be needed and become more or less unemployable. It also doesn't help a great many of the jobs floating about are increasingly temporary in nature, so much so its actually a rarity I see a job with Permenant-full time in its description rather than permenant-temporary full time. I am not going to excuse the men of my generation, but its very easy to see why quite a few are simply saying to hell with it all, especially in larger countries like the US and the UK.
|
|
|
Post by MourningIreland on Jun 30, 2017 12:59:23 GMT
The problem here is exactly what you describe: All the opportunities are in Dublin, and virtually nowhere else on the island, except occasional jobs in the other cities in Ireland, Northern Ireland has the same problem but all the centralisation is focused on Belfast. Globalisation has effectively made these two cities the only cities that matter economically on the island. This wouldn't be a problem... If most people could actually afford to move to these cities in the first place for work. They simply can't the majority of the time unless they are already living in Dublin or near it (which I will grant, is about half the population of the island at present), to take an example from my own life, my last job was in Belfast, paying a wage of 9-10 pounds sterling per hour. I had to travel between one to one and a half hours to and again from work and home where I lived, simply because getting somewhere in Belfast that was affordable for someone making my wages was just nearly impossible, as was getting anywhere cheap enough from any of the towns and cities on the way to Belfast that were affordable, so I was forced to become a 'super commuter' as to what they are called now, so anything between 2-4 hours of my job was simply travelling to make ends meet. It was an entry level job too, so unless you won the Post Code Lottery, you were essentially screwed if you wanted a job that can give you an actual career path. Dublin, I would imagine, is far worse for this kind of effect for anyone who was not living within easy travel distance of Cork, Galway or Wexford, which are also job hubs but nothing on par with Dublin. Its even worse in England with the Behemoth that is London sitting on the Thames like a vampire sucking the life out of England. And as bad as all this is, its only bad news for those who sucked it up and got a degree, its worse in some ways (though better in others) for actual tradesmen, but it depends on how much of a demand there is for those trades at any given time. I am seriously considering reskilling as a welder so I actually have a trade to work with thirty years from now, because I am seriously seeing nothing on the horizon that's workable for people like me, but even that is merely a stopgap measure to keep my head above water. I know its not as bleak and devastating as it was for Middle America, because Ireland was always an agrarian country (although Dublin and especially Northern Ireland was more industrial focused, the North especially and most of those jobs were dominated by the Protestants for obvious reasons) but that just means we had less of a height to fall from when the Celtic Tiger crashed and the enervating effects of globalisation kicked in. I could also go into detail about how all of this is only going to get so much worse when Automation finally kills off 60-90% of the white collar work of the professionals before cutting their way down and making a lot of labour workers obsolete, but thats another topic and its still 5-10 years away before it gets really bad and noticeable, so I won't go into detail here. Suffice it to say, the majority of people with my skills and degree will simply not be needed and become more or less unemployable. It also doesn't help a great many of the jobs floating about are increasingly temporary in nature, so much so its actually a rarity I see a job with Permenant-full time in its description rather than permenant-temporary full time. I am not going to excuse the men of my generation, but its very easy to see why quite a few are simply saying to hell with it all, especially in larger countries like the US and the UK. I hear you loud and clear. You describe a bleak reality that many young people in Ireland today are facing, but that's completely drowned out by a media and populace obsessed with personal ambition and consumerism. Urban Ireland today is dominated by the culture of the nouveau riche. This includes folks who purchased their house prior to 1998, those who have become wealthy working in the white-collar sector (dominated by multinationals, but also includes the civil service with their notorious pensions), and - most insufferably - those who have done both. Demographically, Ireland's nouveau riche includes many people from modest backgrounds who happened to find themselves in the right place at exactly the right time, and have no need whatsoever for God because they have a standard of living beyond their ancestors' wildest dreams, and as far as they are concerned this country is a meritocracy and they earned all of it through their own talent and industriousness. The nouvea riche will tell you how evil and racist Donald Trump is, but they have no interest whatsoever in acknowledging the very real problems faced by people like you. I've written elsewhere that the self-indulgence of this nouveau riche culture is so repulsive to me that here in Dublin I have pretty much withdrawn from all forms social interaction. With regard to establishing a middle-class career in Ireland today, the practical barriers you describe are very real but not wholly insurmountable. Young Americans are in the main in an even worse position than young Europeans because many have crippling student loan debt and an even more depressed job market - and no social welfare state as Europeans know it. In order to get a start in urban Ireland today you have to rent a room in someone's house - in Dublin this will run you around €500 per month - and work long hours and increase your qualifications hoping to advance, and live well below your means for a long, long time to keep your head above water and, hopefully, eventually stabilise. It's restrictive and unpleasant; the pressure to conform is enormous. And it's even more alienating when you have to do this in the midst of the nouvea riche who never shut up about how great they are, and how glamorous their consumerist lifestyles are. NB: You might wonder how I know about all this. I agree with you about the shelf-life of the white-collar sector in Ireland - automation is only one key variable, outsourcing to third-world workers is another. If I were starting out I would get a manual trade - plumber, electrician, RGI, painter-decorator, etc. or a licensed profession that cannot be done remotely i.e. nursing, physiotherapy, structural engineer. I would know in my mind that, like generations before, I would have to relocate at short notice for work if the economy went south. I know tradesmen who have really struggled and others who have done very well. Flexibility, talent, and luck are all part of the picture. My heart aches for you and others facing this reality and I will keep you in my prayers.
|
|