Gemma O'Doherty Google protest

It can be hard to criticise the madness of modern secular Ireland to people who now see this as right , compassionate and caring. When you start explaining a process that has occurred in practically every modern globalised state in terms of conspiracies against an unwilling silent majority you lose most people. There are normal straight forward reasons why people passively embrace comfortable middle class consus lifestyles and attitudes.

Blaming the illuminati or George Soros may give people some sense they can identify a culprit but it does nothing to reverse what in reality is often a relatively freely chosen decision.

I fear somewhat for Gemma's health in that she has taken upon herself a plethora of worthy causes, but more important than that, she sees Ireland (and further afield) as in a race against time before it loses identity and falls to the globalist left. This is causing her to throw herself head first into the counter culture and such intense activity takes its toll.

She is certainly susceptible to discussing and lending credence to some 'conspiracy theories' which may or may not be true (vaccinations, fluoride in water, 5G comms, Chemtrails from planes) and your average RTE interviewer would pounce upon these with glee to belittle her rather than discuss more relevant issues. 

We are being 'socially engineered' and it is imperative to communicate that. But it is difficult to communicate that to the average punter in the street without quickly losing their attention as the problem has many sources and many methods and has been deliberately furtive and insidious. But this is partly why the middle classes freely chose these attitudes. They been deliberately steered in this direction. I'm not sure that the numbers believing the new creed would be as plentiful if the mainstream medias in Europe were not so biased towards the globalising social engineering alongside their allies in the EU, UN and large corporations.


[/quote]

















I agree very much with your remarks on our hopelessly biased media. Most of them seem to see themselves in the role of crusading 1960s civil rights advocates pushing self evidently positive causes. They don't even attempt impartial reporting anymore. Conservatives or traditional Christians in this world view are often viewed as dangerous, ridiculous and or evil.


There are many intellectual currents behind modern liberalism and readers here will be familiar with most of the arguments. There were groups like 18th century free masons advocating radical social reforms for example but using that as a magical explanation for why the Western world has embraced by and large a radical secular existence is rather pointless and overly simplistic. I find sometimes advocates of a single conspiracy based explanation often refuse to consider any other theory or cause. The Jews/masons/gays/communists etc planned it all and are imposing it on us against our will in secret
End of debate.

Liberal ideologues do organise and plan and manipulate the institutions of state to push their vision of humanity. University education at least in the liberal arts does appear to have been largely infiltrated by post modern left leaning extremists . Little of this is secret. The evidence is there if you look for it. The issue is how do you combat it?

While it's a practical impossibility for infiltrations of this sort to hold a lion's share of responsibility for sex-abuse within the church,she's not the first to come up with this. I've seen pamphlets published in the 1950s dealing with real or alleged communist infiltration of Catholic seminaries and,even more interestimg, Vietnamese Catholic refugees have claimed this as part of their own experience of living behind the Iron Curtain.
I read an article today about Prince William Lobkowicz (Czech Republic) and his family's private collection of everything, from paintings and monstrances to manuscripts in Beethoven's own hand. (Josef Frantisek Maximillian,"seventh Prince Lobkowicz",was his patron at one stage). William spent 26 years following the Velvet Revolution reclaiming it all,costing "an enormous amount of money and,Prince William jokes today,his hair" and now makes it available for the public to see(Didn't say at what cost the public sees it,but the Ritz-Carlton was recommended for $830au a night) I just mention this because it might be worth noting that the family lost their entire collection twice in the 20th Century via both Nazism and Communism,perhaps worth remembering in today's era when it's fashionable to constantly publish the evils of the former and forget those of the latter.