eala
Full Member
Posts: 156
|
Post by eala on Mar 9, 2023 19:10:52 GMT
while my proposals for the treatment of Anglicans sound harsh; they are less extreme than what Israel would do to neo Nazis. the duty not to benefit from injustice is not limited to direct perpetrators of the injustice. one who knows themselves to benefit from serious wrongful acts and keeps those benefits instead of returning or refusing them can be construed as an accomplice to the injustice. if i thought there were less harsh methods of achieving the same results as my proposals I would do those instead, but I know of none. does anyone know one or more steps (you do not have to do them all in one step, though I would appreciate it if there were separate proposals that amount to all of the following) that would accomplish the following:- - make the wealthy elite 100% Irish Catholic and 0% Anglican
- return to the irish people and the old Gaelic nobility what was taken from them by usurpers
- reduce the protestent ascendancy to poverty
- secure reparations for the centuries of injustice we have endured
- force Britain to own up to their crimes against Ireland instead of celebrating them
- return ireland's ancient holy places to the religion of the overwelming majority of its people
- save the Irish language from extinction
I give the floor to anyone who claims to have less harsh methods of doing those besides a regime of gaelic supremacy; there is nothing i would love to hear more then a realistic method of acomplishing those; please share them; I wanna hear em; having that done is more importent to me then any question of how Re method, have you looked at 'Pierre Menard, Author of Quixote'by Borges?
|
|
eala
Full Member
Posts: 156
|
Post by eala on Mar 9, 2023 19:14:05 GMT
Re method, have you looked at 'Pierre Menard, Author of Quixote'by Borges? Attachments:
|
|
eala
Full Member
Posts: 156
|
Post by eala on Mar 10, 2023 14:54:47 GMT
while my proposals for the treatment of Anglicans sound harsh; they are less extreme than what Israel would do to neo Nazis. the duty not to benefit from injustice is not limited to direct perpetrators of the injustice. one who knows themselves to benefit from serious wrongful acts and keeps those benefits instead of returning or refusing them can be construed as an accomplice to the injustice. if i thought there were less harsh methods of achieving the same results as my proposals I would do those instead, but I know of none. does anyone know one or more steps (you do not have to do them all in one step, though I would appreciate it if there were separate proposals that amount to all of the following) that would accomplish the following:- - make the wealthy elite 100% Irish Catholic and 0% Anglican
- return to the irish people and the old Gaelic nobility what was taken from them by usurpers
- reduce the protestent ascendancy to poverty
- secure reparations for the centuries of injustice we have endured
- force Britain to own up to their crimes against Ireland instead of celebrating them
- return ireland's ancient holy places to the religion of the overwelming majority of its people
- save the Irish language from extinction
I give the floor to anyone who claims to have less harsh methods of doing those besides a regime of gaelic supremacy; there is nothing i would love to hear more then a realistic method of acomplishing those; please share them; I wanna hear em; having that done is more importent to me then any question of how Is this not essentially social justice identity politics?
|
|
|
Post by connacht4096 on Mar 21, 2023 20:48:25 GMT
I will admit to being an ideological oddball who does not fit neatly into any category due to having opinions from both extremes. I acknowledge that many people will find half my opinions spot on and half bizarre. but I know that things no one has ever made the case for don't get done no matter how much they should be. that is why I make the case for what I believe. also I don't know how many SJWs are interisted in which church should own ancient places of worship or in brining back the gaelic nobility; probably few.
|
|
eala
Full Member
Posts: 156
|
Post by eala on Mar 21, 2023 22:06:36 GMT
I will admit to being an ideological oddball who does not fit neatly into any category due to having opinions from both extremes. I acknowledge that many people will find half my opinions spot on and half bizarre. but I know that things no one has ever made the case for don't get done no matter how much they should be. that is why I make the case for what I believe. also I don't know how many SJWs are interisted in which church should own ancient places of worship or in brining back the gaelic nobility; probably few. Social justice and reparations based on sins of victimiser ancestors to your victimised ancestors, following on to this generation seems to be what you are arguing for. Identity politics can be played with any group.
|
|
|
Post by connacht4096 on Mar 21, 2023 23:10:39 GMT
I am arguing that the son must be held to a duty to not benefit from the sins of the father; and that every consequence of the foreign aggression must be without exception confined to what I call the discontinued past; by which i mean events that produce no present consequences. opening a door, no matter how long ago it happened; only belongs to the discontinued past once the door is closed. I will admit that I do propose extreme things so that comparatively less extreme but still radical things can be compromised down to in negotiation.
|
|
eala
Full Member
Posts: 156
|
Post by eala on Mar 21, 2023 23:22:25 GMT
I am arguing that the son must be held to a duty to not benefit from the sins of the father; and that every consequence of the foreign aggression must be without exception confined to what I call the discontinued past; by which i mean events that produce no present consequences. opening a door, no matter how long ago it happened; only belongs to the discontinued past once the door is closed. I will admit that I do propose extreme things so that comparatively less extreme but still radical things can be compromised down to in negotiation. Who knows what consequences the past produced in terms of present benefits. A man Doyle marries a woman Murphy, and their son Peter marries a woman Roche, they've a child Emer. Ought Emer be answerable for the crimes of the Vikings — Doyle, the Normans Roche, or is she innocent of all wrong doing — Murphy. How are you going to assess Emer's privilege? Why stop at the Viking, Normans and Gaelic, her ancestors likely include the Fir Bolgs and the Neathertals and they likely got shafted by someone too.
|
|